You are here

regulatory reform

08.07.2015

More than a dozen engineers, legal experts, economists, civil rights representatives and diverse business groups filed amicus briefs supporting USTelecom’s challenge of the Federal Communicat

08.06.2015

In their opening brief, USTelecom et al.

08.06.2015

The bi-partisan Telecommunications Act of 1996 (Act) could not be clearer regarding regulation of the Internet: “The Internet and other interactive computer services have flourished, to the b

08.06.2015

The FCC’s reclassification of Broadband Internet Access Service (BIAS) under Title II fails to recognize both the nature of the Internet’s structure and functions, and the relationship

08.06.2015

Section 706 of the 1996 Act was a freestanding enactment that Congress deliberately chose not to insert into the 1934 Act.

08.06.2015

Title II of the Communications Act of 1934 is a poor fit for regulating the most technologically advanced and dynamic information system in history: It is Depression-era legislation adopted to regu

08.06.2015

For more than 20 years, a strong bipartisan consensus has existed in favor of a free and open Internet—one unfettered by government regulation.

08.06.2015

Background: Today, the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) voted 3-2 to approve new regulations to govern the nation’s switch from legacy copper telephone networks to new broadband fi

08.05.2015

The United States Telecom Association (USTelecom) submits these comments in response to the notice released by the Consumer and Governmental Affairs Bureau of the Federal Communications Commission

07.30.2015

Background: Today, USTelecom and other entities jointly submitted arguments to the U.S.

Pages